Last Blogs! Prompt 2: Climate Change


I do not believe that failure to mitigate climate change is a result of limitations in science and technology; as a plethora of scientific evidence indicates, climate change is having monumental effects and is primarily the cause of human activity. I agree with Ausubel that “on a technological plane,” (159) we can reduce CO2 emissions and thus help mitigate climate change. With California as an exception, the problem largely relates to policymakers’ and governments’ resentment about straying away from “business as usual.” I agree with the “redesign of our civilization” that Ausubel prescribes, and that this requires decentralization and more efficient, localized systems of governance. I also think that more education regarding the issue of climate change is necessary; if constituencies are more aware of the problem and potential catastrophic effects of climate change, they are more likely to work to get governments to adopt policies designed to mitigate it.

I do not think that a climate change mitigation scheme will easily fit into government policy as it has been operating, but that is why a systemic redesign is necessary. Environmental concerns like climate change are not necessarily conducive to the primary government aims of growth, economic development, technological innovation, and increasing globalization. Thus, I think it is going to take a massive reconsideration of priorities in order for climate change to make it onto the policy agenda in a way that will help mitigate the crises associated with it. As Ausubel mentions, education and decentralization are critical components of such an endeavor.


One response »

  1. I do believe that mitigation of climate change and government policy are not very compatible concepts. The problem, for me, lies in the fact that government and big business are basically one and the same, and, currently there is little money on green technologies, and climate change mitigation. The money right now is in big oil, and big industry. Now, that is most likely going to change in the future, when green energy becomes mainstream and starts generating the amounts of money required to lobby in congress, and to basically do what oil companies do now, and tip the balance in their favor.
    The problem is, in my opinion, how do we get form the world we are in now, to one where the powerful industries are those who, not by virtue of being good and caring, but by virtue of the money being in it for them, will be those that use green energies. And how we handle that transition will determine what kind of world we will have.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s